IBSC Postdoctoral Training Program Applicant Evaluation Worksheet – Institute for the Biology of Stem Cells at UC Santa Cruz

For Postdoctoral Applicants

The form below is designed to be used by the External Selection Committee associated with each of the IBSC’s Postdoctoral Training Programs. Questions specific to a particular program are dynamically displayed based on the selected program(s). This form can be used for up to seven (7) applications, for all training programs. If you have any questions regarding this form or have any issues, please contact the IBSC.

Contact the IBSC

IBSC Applicant Evaluation Worksheet

Date of Review *

Reviewer Name *

Reviewer Name

First

Last

Instructions

Please evaluate the applicant on the following 5-point scale:

Outstanding
Very Good
Good
Adequate
Needs Improvement

Please base your evaluation(s) on the Application/CV; Applicant Statements; and Letters of Recommendation including the Sponsoring Mentor Form.

Number of Applications Evaluated *

Applicant 01

Applicant Name *

Applicant Name

First

Last

Program(s) Applied *

IRACDA

T32

CIRM

Research Experience

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's conceptual research ability (i.e. critical thinking and ability to see the big picture) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's technical research ability (i.e. ability to perform experiments and generate publication quality data) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's written communication, including ability to organize scientific data *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of applicant's scientific creativity *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's Publications *

Please evaluate Quality; Quantity; and First-authorship or potential for first-authorship
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring and Outreach

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, inclusive access to scientific knowledge *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to inclusive access, while past OR future inclusiveness may be scored as a 2 or worse

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, scientific knowledge (outreach or other activities) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to outreach, while past OR future outreach may be scored as a 2 or worse

Training Environment

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring plan is well tailored to maximize the applicant's training (i.e. demonstrates knowledge of the applicant) *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentor has received mentoring training *

Yes

Mentor has plans to receive additional mentoring training *

Yes

IRACDA Specific

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire for a career in biomedical teaching/mentoring students at an academic institution *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire to promote inclusive mentoring skills *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research Proposal

Please note that the Research proposal does NOT need to be specifically related to stem cell research

Research proposal is well thought out and researched *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research proposal is feasible for the applicant given the mentor, resources and research environment *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Significance and/or potential impact of proposed research is well articulated and substantiated *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Please state the biggest score driving strength and weakness of the application (i.e. one strength and one weakness) *

0 of 150 max words

Applicant 02

Applicant Name *

Applicant Name

First

Last

Program(s) Applied *

IRACDA

T32

CIRM

Research Experience

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's conceptual research ability (i.e. critical thinking and ability to see the big picture) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's technical research ability (i.e. ability to perform experiments and generate publication quality data) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's written communication, including ability to organize scientific data *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of applicant's scientific creativity *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's Publications *

Please evaluate Quality; Quantity; and First-authorship or potential for first-authorship
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring and Outreach

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, inclusive access to scientific knowledge *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to inclusive access, while past OR future inclusiveness may be scored as a 2 or worse

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, scientific knowledge (outreach or other activities) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to outreach, while past OR future outreach may be scored as a 2 or worse

Training Environment

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring plan is well tailored to maximize the applicant's training (i.e. demonstrates knowledge of the applicant) *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentor has received mentoring training *

Yes

Mentor has plans to receive additional mentoring training *

Yes

IRACDA Specific

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire for a career in biomedical teaching/mentoring students at an academic institution *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire to promote inclusive mentoring skills *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research Proposal

Please note that the Research proposal does NOT need to be specifically related to stem cell research

Research proposal is well thought out and researched *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research proposal is feasible for the applicant given the mentor, resources and research environment *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Significance and/or potential impact of proposed research is well articulated and substantiated *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Please state the biggest score driving strength and weakness of the application (i.e. one strength and one weakness) *

0 of 150 max words

Applicant 03

Applicant Name *

Applicant Name

First

Last

Program(s) Applied *

IRACDA

T32

CIRM

Research Experience

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's conceptual research ability (i.e. critical thinking and ability to see the big picture) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's technical research ability (i.e. ability to perform experiments and generate publication quality data) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's written communication, including ability to organize scientific data *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of applicant's scientific creativity *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's Publications *

Please evaluate Quality; Quantity; and First-authorship or potential for first-authorship
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring and Outreach

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, inclusive access to scientific knowledge *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to inclusive access, while past OR future inclusiveness may be scored as a 2 or worse

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, scientific knowledge (outreach or other activities) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to outreach, while past OR future outreach may be scored as a 2 or worse

Training Environment

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring plan is well tailored to maximize the applicant's training (i.e. demonstrates knowledge of the applicant) *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentor has received mentoring training *

Yes

Mentor has plans to receive additional mentoring training *

Yes

IRACDA Specific

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire for a career in biomedical teaching/mentoring students at an academic institution *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire to promote inclusive mentoring skills *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research Proposal

Please note that the Research proposal does NOT need to be specifically related to stem cell research

Research proposal is well thought out and researched *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research proposal is feasible for the applicant given the mentor, resources and research environment *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Significance and/or potential impact of proposed research is well articulated and substantiated *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Please state the biggest score driving strength and weakness of the application (i.e. one strength and one weakness) *

0 of 150 max words

Applicant 04

Applicant Name *

Applicant Name

First

Last

Program(s) Applied *

IRACDA

T32

CIRM

Research Experience

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's conceptual research ability (i.e. critical thinking and ability to see the big picture) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's technical research ability (i.e. ability to perform experiments and generate publication quality data) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's written communication, including ability to organize scientific data *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of applicant's scientific creativity *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's Publications *

Please evaluate Quality; Quantity; and First-authorship or potential for first-authorship
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring and Outreach

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, inclusive access to scientific knowledge *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to inclusive access, while past OR future inclusiveness may be scored as a 2 or worse

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, scientific knowledge (outreach or other activities) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to outreach, while past OR future outreach may be scored as a 2 or worse

Training Environment

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring plan is well tailored to maximize the applicant's training (i.e. demonstrates knowledge of the applicant) *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentor has received mentoring training *

Yes

Mentor has plans to receive additional mentoring training *

Yes

IRACDA Specific

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire for a career in biomedical teaching/mentoring students at an academic institution *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire to promote inclusive mentoring skills *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research Proposal

Please note that the Research proposal does NOT need to be specifically related to stem cell research

Research proposal is well thought out and researched *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research proposal is feasible for the applicant given the mentor, resources and research environment *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Significance and/or potential impact of proposed research is well articulated and substantiated *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Please state the biggest score driving strength and weakness of the application (i.e. one strength and one weakness) *

0 of 150 max words

Applicant 05

Applicant Name *

Applicant Name

First

Last

Program(s) Applied *

IRACDA

T32

CIRM

Research Experience

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's conceptual research ability (i.e. critical thinking and ability to see the big picture) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's technical research ability (i.e. ability to perform experiments and generate publication quality data) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's written communication, including ability to organize scientific data *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of applicant's scientific creativity *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's Publications *

Please evaluate Quality; Quantity; and First-authorship or potential for first-authorship
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring and Outreach

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, inclusive access to scientific knowledge *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to inclusive access, while past OR future inclusiveness may be scored as a 2 or worse

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, scientific knowledge (outreach or other activities) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to outreach, while past OR future outreach may be scored as a 2 or worse

Training Environment

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring plan is well tailored to maximize the applicant's training (i.e. demonstrates knowledge of the applicant) *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentor has received mentoring training *

Yes

Mentor has plans to receive additional mentoring training *

Yes

IRACDA Specific

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire for a career in biomedical teaching/mentoring students at an academic institution *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire to promote inclusive mentoring skills *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research Proposal

Please note that the Research proposal does NOT need to be specifically related to stem cell research

Research proposal is well thought out and researched *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research proposal is feasible for the applicant given the mentor, resources and research environment *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Significance and/or potential impact of proposed research is well articulated and substantiated *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Please state the biggest score driving strength and weakness of the application (i.e. one strength and one weakness) *

0 of 150 max words

Applicant 06

Applicant Name *

Applicant Name

First

Last

Program(s) Applied *

IRACDA

T32

CIRM

Research Experience

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's conceptual research ability (i.e. critical thinking and ability to see the big picture) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's technical research ability (i.e. ability to perform experiments and generate publication quality data) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's written communication, including ability to organize scientific data *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of applicant's scientific creativity *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's Publications *

Please evaluate Quality; Quantity; and First-authorship or potential for first-authorship
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring and Outreach

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, inclusive access to scientific knowledge *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to inclusive access, while past OR future inclusiveness may be scored as a 2 or worse

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, scientific knowledge (outreach or other activities) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to outreach, while past OR future outreach may be scored as a 2 or worse

Training Environment

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring plan is well tailored to maximize the applicant's training (i.e. demonstrates knowledge of the applicant) *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentor has received mentoring training *

Yes

Mentor has plans to receive additional mentoring training *

Yes

IRACDA Specific

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire for a career in biomedical teaching/mentoring students at an academic institution *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire to promote inclusive mentoring skills *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research Proposal

Please note that the Research proposal does NOT need to be specifically related to stem cell research

Research proposal is well thought out and researched *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research proposal is feasible for the applicant given the mentor, resources and research environment *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Significance and/or potential impact of proposed research is well articulated and substantiated *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Please state the biggest score driving strength and weakness of the application (i.e. one strength and one weakness) *

0 of 150 max words

Applicant 07

Applicant Name *

Applicant Name

First

Last

Program(s) Applied *

IRACDA

T32

CIRM

Research Experience

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's conceptual research ability (i.e. critical thinking and ability to see the big picture) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of breadth and depth of applicant's technical research ability (i.e. ability to perform experiments and generate publication quality data) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both outstanding breadth and depth, while outstanding depth OR breadth may be scored as a 2 or worse
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's written communication, including ability to organize scientific data *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence of applicant's scientific creativity *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant's Publications *

Please evaluate Quality; Quantity; and First-authorship or potential for first-authorship
1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring and Outreach

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, inclusive access to scientific knowledge *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to inclusive access, while past OR future inclusiveness may be scored as a 2 or worse

Evidence that applicant has promoted, or has a strong interest in promoting, scientific knowledge (outreach or other activities) *

Note: A score of 1 will likely require both a track record and future commitment to outreach, while past OR future outreach may be scored as a 2 or worse

Training Environment

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentoring plan is well tailored to maximize the applicant's training (i.e. demonstrates knowledge of the applicant) *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Mentor has received mentoring training *

Yes

Mentor has plans to receive additional mentoring training *

Yes

IRACDA Specific

1= Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire for a career in biomedical teaching/mentoring students at an academic institution *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Applicant has a stated desire to promote inclusive mentoring skills *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research Proposal

Please note that the Research proposal does NOT need to be specifically related to stem cell research

Research proposal is well thought out and researched *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Research proposal is feasible for the applicant given the mentor, resources and research environment *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Significance and/or potential impact of proposed research is well articulated and substantiated *

1 = Outstanding; 5 = Needs Improvement

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Please state the biggest score driving strength and weakness of the application (i.e. one strength and one weakness) *

0 of 150 max words

Applicant Ranking

Please rank the Applicants evaluated above in order of strength of application, regardless of program applied *

0 of 150 max words

If you are human, leave this field blank.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

For Postdoctoral Applicants

Instructions

Applicant 01 arrowup3

Research Experience

Mentoring and Outreach

Training Environment

IRACDA Specific

Research Proposal

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Applicant 02 arrowup3

Research Experience

Mentoring and Outreach

Training Environment

IRACDA Specific

Research Proposal

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Applicant 03 arrowup3

Research Experience

Mentoring and Outreach

Training Environment

IRACDA Specific

Research Proposal

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Applicant 04 arrowup3

Research Experience

Mentoring and Outreach

Training Environment

IRACDA Specific

Research Proposal

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Applicant 05 arrowup3

Research Experience

Mentoring and Outreach

Training Environment

IRACDA Specific

Research Proposal

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Applicant 06 arrowup3

Research Experience

Mentoring and Outreach

Training Environment

IRACDA Specific

Research Proposal

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Applicant 07 arrowup3

Research Experience

Mentoring and Outreach

Training Environment

IRACDA Specific

Research Proposal

Driving Strengths and Weaknesses

Applicant Ranking

Applicant 01

Applicant 02

Applicant 03

Applicant 04

Applicant 05

Applicant 06

Applicant 07